Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review

Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J et al.

British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 119 (3): 369-83.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex228

Background

Tracheal intubation is used for airway management in 38.4% of general anaesthetics – 1.1 million procedures per year (UK data). Difficult intubation occurs in 1-6% of cases (66,000 cases/year). Failed intubation occurs in 0.1-0.3% of cases (3,300 cases/year).

Method

In this meta-analysis, 64 randomised controlled trials (7044 participants >16 years old) comparing video laryngoscopy (VL – included 13 different types of VL) versus direct laryngoscopy (DL – using Macintosh blade), primarily in elective theatre (61 elective theatres). 1 ED, 1 ICU and 1 out of hospital studies were included.

Results

 

VL is favourable compared to DL in terms of successful intubation, but on subgroup analysis this is only significant if the intubator is experienced i.e >20 intubations with VL. In addition, VL is advantageous in patients with predicted difficult airway, better at achieving a good view (Grade 1-2), reducing laryngeal trauma, reducing voice hoarseness and increasing ease of intubation.
There were no significant differences between VL and DL in less experienced hands (<20 intubations with VL) in terms of mortality rate, hypoxia, sore throat, number of attempts, and successful first attempt

at intubation.

Stated Limitations from Study

Heterogeneity

– 9 types of VL vs DL

– Intubator of varying experience

– Range of patient population (in terms of normal vs predicted difficult airway)

Primarily elective theatres

– Only 1 study each for ED, ICU and out of hospital

Discussion from Journal Club meeting

Trainees should be encouraged to familiarise themselves with using VL

Limited VL available in department therefore DL will still be primary device

Consider VL in patient with predicted difficult airway

Patient preparation (i.e optimal position, adequately paralysed etc.) should remain main focus

 

Summary by Dr A. Tan. Journal Club 30 November 2017.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: